PPM v Keeper. C7GF75EN. Wakefield. 20/07/2017
The claim was for 2 PCNs at Travelodge, Hounslow.
The hearing (keeper report)
The judge dismissed the claim. She said that she was sick of telling Gladstones the same things.
Their witness statement was not good enough.
The proof of signage was no good.
They they had not made it clear whether it was the driver or the keeper they were claiming from.
They had no right to claim for additional monies other than the £100 per ticket that they had originally specified.
She insinuated that their business model seemed to to scare people into paying up before the case went to court and claiming additional money that they knew they would not have any right to in a court.
My witness statement was never even mentioned and I never had to open my mouth in court other than to say "Thank you ma'am".
Prankster Note
This judge seems to have hit the nail on the head.
Happy Parking
The Parking Prankster
The claim was for 2 PCNs at Travelodge, Hounslow.
The hearing (keeper report)
The judge dismissed the claim. She said that she was sick of telling Gladstones the same things.
Their witness statement was not good enough.
The proof of signage was no good.
They they had not made it clear whether it was the driver or the keeper they were claiming from.
They had no right to claim for additional monies other than the £100 per ticket that they had originally specified.
She insinuated that their business model seemed to to scare people into paying up before the case went to court and claiming additional money that they knew they would not have any right to in a court.
My witness statement was never even mentioned and I never had to open my mouth in court other than to say "Thank you ma'am".
Prankster Note
This judge seems to have hit the nail on the head.
Happy Parking
The Parking Prankster